40 papers across AI, ML, NLP, and CV from the last 24 hours.
Today's batch reveals a clear push toward agent systems that operate beyond single-turn prompting. Multiple papers tackle agent reasoning under changing conditions—tracking memory evolution across dynamic environments, studying recursive agent harnesses where agents spawn subagents, and redesigning evaluation itself by making assessment agent-native rather than harness-locked. The pattern suggests the field is treating agents not as applications of LLMs but as architectural primitives worth their own theory.
A second strand runs through several papers on reasoning mechanics: whether it's decomposing LLM reasoning failures via operad theory, examining when chain-of-thought crosses a "commitment boundary," or probing epiphenomenal reasoning steps that don't causally affect the output. These papers are stepping back from building better reasoners to ask what reasoning actually is in these models.
The most surprising paper is Before You Think: System 0, AI-Mediated Cognition and Cognitive Colonization, which argues that AI systems can colonize human cognitive processes—not by replacing reasoning, but by preempting it before conscious thought arrives. It stands out in a batch dominated by engineering papers because it frames the danger not at the model level but at the level of human cognition itself.
What's notably absent: no papers on new foundation model architectures or scaling laws. The batch is entirely about what to do with existing models—how to structure agents, reason about their behavior, and deploy them in real-world settings. The field appears to be shifting from building bigger models to building better scaffolding around the ones we already have.
Jundong Xu, Qingchuan Li, Jiaying Wu · 2026-06-11
Large language model (LLM) agents have achieved strong performance on a wide range of benchmarks, yet most evaluations assume static environments. In contrast, real-world deployment is inherently dynamic, requiring agents to continually align their knowledge, skills, and behavior with changing environments and updated task conditions. To address this gap, we introduce EvoArena, a benchmark suite t…
Zilin Xiao, Qi Ma, Chun-cheng Jason Chen · 2026-06-11
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a standard mechanism for grounding language models in external knowledge, yet conventional retrieval based on lexical or semantic similarity is poorly suited for complex reasoning tasks: a semantically similar problem may demand an entirely different solution strategy, while a superficially different problem may share the same underlying reasoning pa…
Dimitri Kachler, Damien Sileo, Pascal Denis · 2026-06-11
With the growth of LLMs' (Large Language Models) capabilities, there has been an increasing push to curate high quality datasets by filtering samples in the training data. In general, Data Attribution (DA) methods aim to estimate how individual samples in a training dataset can precondition a model to generate certain outputs. As an example, one might be interested in which samples in the data cou…
Yaxin Du, Yifan Zhou, Yujie Ge · 2026-06-11
Tool-augmented LLM agents commonly rely on step-wise atomic tool calls, where each invocation, observation, and value transfer is exposed in the main reasoning trace. This creates an \emph{execution-granularity mismatch}: locally deterministic tool workflows are unfolded into repeated model-visible decisions, consuming context and forcing the model to manage low-level dataflow in the trace. We int…
Nathaniel Bottman, Yinhong Liu, Kyle Richardson · 2026-06-11
Detecting LLM reasoning failures at inference time without ground-truth labels has motivated a wide range of confidence baselines, including self-consistency, semantic entropy, and P(True), built on within-question sampling and self-evaluation. Operad theory, the formalism for systems built by iterated substitution, suggests a complementary diagnostic: a model's direct answer to a compositional qu…
Marek Šuppa, Andrej Ridzik, Daniel Hládek · 2026-06-11
We introduce SkMTEB, the first comprehensive MTEB-style text embedding benchmark for Slovak, a low-resource West Slavic language, comprising 31 datasets across 7 task types -- nearly 4$\times$ the depth of existing multilingual benchmark coverage for Slovak. Our evaluation of 31 embedding models reveals that large instruction-tuned multilingual models achieve the strongest performance, while exist…
Elias Lumer, Sahil Sen, Kevin Paul · 2026-06-11
Recursive language models (RLMs) showed that recursion over model calls is an effective strategy for long-context reasoning, and production coding agents have begun to write code that spawns subagents at scale, most recently in Anthropic's dynamic workflows. We name and study the pattern between these two lines of work, where the recursive unit is a full agent harness with filesystem tools, code e…
Nathaniel Bottman, Kyle Richardson · 2026-06-11
Question decomposition, i.e. breaking a complex query into simpler sub-queries whose answers are composed to produce a final answer, is a widely used strategy for improving LLM reasoning, yet it currently lacks a rigorous mathematical foundation. In this paper, we propose operads, mathematical structures that model many-in, one-out operations and compositions thereof, as a natural framework for de…
Pedro Correa, Olivier Perrotin, Samir Sadok · 2026-06-11
The choice of speech representation is critical in speech-driven 3D facial animation. Representations differ in what they encode: SSL features emphasize segmental and semantic cues, neural codecs yield latents optimized for acoustic reconstruction, and ASR-style objectives produce label-based spaces. We evaluate four speech representation families for 3D facial synthesis, comparing their facial re…
Jialin Gan, Xin Qiu, Guangzhe Chen · 2026-06-11
Large language models (LLMs) have enabled time series (TS) analysis by jointly modeling numerical observations and textual context through a shared token interface. However, TS tokens and prompt tokens exhibit fundamentally different information structures, making uniform token processing inefficient. In this paper, we study token efficiency in TS language modeling from an asymmetric-token perspec…
Minghao Luo, Liang Chen · 2026-06-11
Search-augmented LLMs increasingly mediate everyday consumer recommendations by retrieving live web content. This creates a new risk: generative recommenders may consume polluted web content, such as fake reviews and promotional pages crafted to mislead recommendations. We ask: to what extent do search-augmented LLMs become unwitting promoters of fake products when consuming polluted retrieval res…
Tobias Holtdirk, Pietro Marcolongo, Anna Steinberg Schulten · 2026-06-11
Reproducibility in the social and behavioral sciences is typically evaluated by independent researchers who reanalyze the original data to assess whether the published findings can be recovered. However, such approaches are resource-intensive and difficult to scale. Here, we show that large language models (LLMs) can automate reproducibility assessments. Using N=76 published studies with predefine…
Zongsheng Cao, Bihao Zhan, Jinxin Shi · 2026-06-11
Current LLM-based research agents have advanced through agent orchestration, yet largely overlook scientific knowledge orchestration. Existing works often reduce papers to abstracts, surface mentions, and flat \texttt{cites} edges, omitting key entities, claims, evidence, mechanisms, and method lineages essential for scientific reasoning. To this end, we introduce \textbf{Agents-K1}, an end-to-end…
Amy Xin, Jiening Siow, Junjie Wang · 2026-06-11
LLM-based agents have shown increasing potential in automating scientific discovery. Given an optimizable metric and an execution environment, they can propose, validate, and iterate scientific solutions, and have produced results that outperform human-designed approaches. As model capabilities continue to improve, we argue that the bottleneck for autonomous scientific discovery is shifting from p…
Marianna Bergamaschi Ganapini, Massimo Chiriatti, Enrico Panai · 2026-06-11
This paper examines three recent frameworks for understanding the cognitive and epistemic consequences of artificial intelligence: Tri-System Theory, Thinkframes, and System 0. It argues that while the first two capture important dimensions of AI's influence on individual reasoning and collective epistemic practices, System 0 occupies a theoretically distinctive position that neither can fully rep…
Achraf Hsain, Sultan Almuhammadi · 2026-06-11
Shielded reinforcement learning is typically presented as a runtime safety mechanism that compiles temporal-logic specifications into automata restricting an agent's actions. We argue this is the wrong product. The same automata-theoretic machinery -- specification compilation, product game construction, attractor computation, and winning-region extraction -- is better read as a design-time analyt…
Xiaoyuan Liu, Jianhong Tu, Yuqi Chen · 2026-06-11
Agent systems are advancing quickly across domains, but their evaluation remains fragmented. Most benchmarks rely on fixed, LLM-centric harnesses that require heavy integration, create test-production mismatch, and limit fair comparison across diverse agent designs. The root problem is the lack of an open, agent-agnostic assessment interface. We advocate Agentified Agent Assessment (AAA), where ev…
Zach Studdiford, Gary Lupyan · 2026-06-11
When large language models (LLMs) fail to generalize or make haphazard errors in reasoning, it is often taken as evidence that LLMs are not truly reasoning, but rather performing a kind of pattern matching. The implication is that people's behavior does not exhibit the same types of failures because human reasoning uses principled and abstract world models. We evaluate human participants and 25 LL…
Haochen Wu, Yi Hou, Shiguang Xie · 2026-06-11
Dispatch in three-sided marketplaces provides a natural setting for reinforcement learning from world feedback: decisions are evaluated by delayed operational outcomes such as delivery speed, courier utilization, and merchant congestion. We present a deployed reinforcement learning system at DoorDash that adapts dispatch objective weights in a large-scale food-delivery marketplace using delayed si…
Harihara Muralidharan, Reema Baskar, Soo Hee Lee · 2026-06-11
We introduce EpiBench, a verifiable benchmark for short-horizon epigenomics analysis. EpiBench evaluates whether agents can make well-defined analysis decisions from realistic workflow states and return deterministically gradable answers. The benchmark includes 106 evaluations across CUT&Tag/CUT&RUN, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, and DNA methylation workflows. Across 5,088 valid trajectories from 16 model…
King Yeung Tsang, Zihao Zhao, Vishal Venkataramani · 2026-06-11
Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) built on Large Language Models (LLMs) require effective orchestration to coordinate specialized agents, yet training such orchestrators is hindered by limited supervision and high computational cost. We propose Orchestration Reward Modeling (OrchRM), a self-supervised framework for evaluating orchestration quality without human annotations. OrchRM leverages intermediate a…
Ali Elahi, Barbara Di Eugenio · 2026-06-11
Confidence is used for reliability, oversight, and a range of downstream decision tasks in Natural Language Processing (NLP), yet no existing method produces or evaluates a confidence for the output of a multiagent system. Prior work uses confidence within multiagent debate (MAD) to weight messages, trigger debate, or calibrate individual agents, but it never aggregates these into a single confide…
James Flora, Mitchell Black, Weng-Keen Wong · 2026-06-11
Positional encodings (PEs) enhance the power of graph neural networks (GNNs), both theoretically and empirically. Two of the most popular families of PEs - spectral (e.g., Laplacian eigenspaces, effective resistance) and walk-based (polynomials of the adjacency matrix) - are theoretically equivalent in expressive power, with expressivity between the 1-WL and 3-WL tests. However, this equivalence a…
Guo Yu, Wenlin Liu, Yulan Hu · 2026-06-11
On-policy distillation (\textsc{OPD}) has recently become a prominent post-training recipe as it combines two desirable ingredients: on-policy student trajectories and dense teacher supervision, yet how this hybrid changes a model's parameters remains unclear. Across several language and vision-language model pairs and use cases, our analysis yields two main findings. On sparsity, \textsc{OPD}-sty…
Ayushman Trivedi, Bhavika Melwani · 2026-06-11
Catastrophic forgetting is often viewed as the destruction of previously learned knowledge during sequential learning. Building on the Accessibility Collapse framework, we investigate the geometric structure of recoverability in continual learning. Using Split CIFAR-100 and a sequentially trained ResNet-18, we analyze recoverability, representational drift, and recovery complexity across ten tasks…
This digest is generated automatically from arXiv submissions. Not affiliated with arXiv or Cornell University.